Website and product guidance

Search Proplix

Results combine Proplix product pages with detailed Help Centre guidance.

Address History

Address History

A structured way to maintain the relevant residential history used during pre-tenancy review, while keeping applicant, property and pre-tenancy context connected.

What it does

What Address History does in Proplix

Address History is part of Proplix Applicants, Renters & Pre-Tenancy and is designed to maintain the relevant residential history used during pre-tenancy review. It keeps current and previous residence periods and their ordering against the applicant and property context that gives it meaning.

Within the wider Address History workflow, Address History supports structured residential history that can be reviewed chronologically rather than reconstructed from free text and should lead towards a structured address history that supports follow-up and review without rebuilding the same information from public forms, inboxes or spreadsheets.

Why it matters

Why this capability matters before tenancy onboarding

Address History matters because the team needs a coherent view of current and previous addresses. If current and previous residence periods and their ordering is scattered across separate records, the next colleague may have to work out which applicant, property and version is current before acting.

A structured Address History record supports a structured address history that supports follow-up and review while reducing the risk that address periods are incomplete, duplicated or difficult to compare because dates and residences are recorded inconsistently and keeping human review, privacy controls and the organisation's fair decision process intact.

When it is useful

Where Address History adds operational value

For Address History, this section focuses on maintain the relevant residential history used during pre-tenancy review while keeping the applicant and property context visible.

The point in the journey

The team needs a coherent view of current and previous addresses. Address History gives that moment a defined place so the applicant and property relationship does not get lost.

The outcome to protect

A structured address history that supports follow-up and review. Keep current and previous residence periods and their ordering connected to the application so the authorised next action is clear without reconstructing the record from separate sources.

How it works

How Address History fits into the workflow

The exact screen and permission path for Address History depends on the user's role, but the applicant, property and application context should remain connected throughout.

  1. 01

    Open the right applicant context

    Address History should begin from the applicant, property or application record involved when the team needs a coherent view of current and previous addresses. Starting there keeps current and previous residence periods and their ordering anchored to the correct pre-tenancy journey.

  2. 02

    Build an understandable chronology

    Use Address History to record current and previous residence periods and their ordering with the dates and residence sequence needed for a structured address history that supports follow-up and review. For Address History, the value comes from a coherent current and previous residence periods and their ordering history rather than a loose list of addresses.

  3. 03

    Make the record understandable

    An authorised colleague reviewing Address History should be able to see what current and previous residence periods and their ordering means and how it relates to a structured address history that supports follow-up and review without rebuilding the story from another system.

  4. 04

    Check gaps and corrections

    Before relying on Address History, review current and previous residence periods and their ordering for gaps, overlaps or mistakes that could obscure a structured address history that supports follow-up and review. When Address History facts change, amend the existing current and previous residence periods and their ordering entry so the chronology needed for a structured address history that supports follow-up and review stays coherent.

  5. 05

    Hand off deliberately

    If Address History reaches its intended outcome — a structured address history that supports follow-up and review — carry forward the applicant and property context needed by the next authorised stage instead of copying the whole application into another uncontrolled record.

Core capability

What Address History helps the team control

Connected applicant context

Address History keeps current and previous residence periods and their ordering attached to the applicant and property context in which it is needed.

Structured information

Instead of leaving current and previous residence periods and their ordering in free-form messages, Address History gives it a repeatable structure that supports maintain the relevant residential history used during pre-tenancy review.

Chronological review

Address History keeps current and previous residence periods and their ordering in an understandable sequence, making the gaps or corrections that matter to a structured address history that supports follow-up and review easier to identify.

Workflow continuity

Address History can carry the context needed for a structured address history that supports follow-up and review into the next authorised stage without asking for the same facts again.

Real-world workflow

What Address History looks like in practice

Consider a case where the team needs a coherent view of current and previous addresses. The applicant or authorised team member uses Address History from the relevant property or application context, so current and previous residence periods and their ordering is captured against the record that will actually be reviewed.

A second authorised colleague can see what was provided, identify missing detail and, if the case progresses, hand only the context needed for a structured address history that supports follow-up and review into the next authorised stage.

Implementation standard

How to introduce Address History into a live applicant workflow

For Address History, implementation should keep information proportionate to its purpose, clearly owned and dependable through corrections, exceptions and handoffs.

Give Address History a clear owner before rollout. Decide who is responsible for current and previous residence periods and their ordering, which values are applicant-supplied and which authorised staff may amend or review them.

Keep Address History proportionate to maintain the relevant residential history used during pre-tenancy review. Make optional detail clear and protect public entry points with appropriate access, transport and rate controls.

Test the normal case and realistic exceptions such as missing information, a correction after submission, an unavailable property or a revoked invitation before handing the context into the next workflow.

Who uses it

Who works with Address History before a tenancy is created

Address History supports the authorised people who provide, organise, review or progress this part of the applicant journey.

Applicants and renters
Lettings teams
Referencing staff
Authorised reviewers
Operational considerations

Keep Address History data, decisions and permissions aligned

Address History can involve personal or financial information. Apply least-privilege access, privacy notices, retention rules and lawful data handling to current and previous residence periods and their ordering.

A structured record improves consistency but does not verify current and previous residence periods and their ordering automatically; authorised users should correct material errors before relying on it.

Any decision informed by Address History should remain fair, explainable and limited to the legitimate purpose of maintain the relevant residential history used during pre-tenancy review, while preserving the same applicant and property identity across handoff.

Connected Proplix capabilities

Related features in Applicants, Renters & Pre-Tenancy

These pages sit close to Address History in the wider application and pre-tenancy architecture.

Frequently asked questions

Questions about Address History

What is Address History used for in Proplix?

Address History is an Applicants, Renters & Pre-Tenancy capability for maintain the relevant residential history used during pre-tenancy review. It keeps current and previous residence periods and their ordering connected to the relevant applicant and property journey.

When is Address History most useful?

Address History is most useful when the team needs a coherent view of current and previous addresses. In that situation, the intended operational result is a structured address history that supports follow-up and review.

Who should be able to access Address History?

Access to Address History should be limited to applicants and authorised staff who genuinely need current and previous residence periods and their ordering for maintain the relevant residential history used during pre-tenancy review, according to your organisation's permissions and data-handling policy.

How does Address History connect to tenant onboarding?

If Address History is authorised to progress, the applicant and property context needed for a structured address history that supports follow-up and review can support a controlled handoff into the separate tenancy-onboarding workflow. Capturing current and previous residence periods and their ordering does not by itself create tenancy approval or a contract.

See it in context

Explore how Address History fits your applicant journey

See Address History alongside property interest, application information, household context, affordability evidence, review and the later onboarding handoff. A walkthrough can focus on your actual lettings process rather than a generic software tour.

Book a Proplix walkthrough →

Working with the capability

How Address History fits into dependable property operations

The strongest starting point is the work people actually complete, including the exceptions that rarely appear in a process diagram. This capability belongs inside the daily operating record, where property context, relationships, tasks, documents and decisions can be followed together instead of being reconstructed from separate systems.

01 · People and permissions

Give each role enough context to act

Operational staff need a clear next action; managers need ownership and exceptions; clients and external participants need only the information their role permits. The practical value comes from serving those views without creating parallel versions of the truth. For Address History, that means access should follow an evidenced business need and change when responsibility changes.

02 · Handover and evidence

Keep the reason beside the action

A useful workflow records who received the work, what they checked, what remains outstanding and why a decision was made. That creates a handover another authorised colleague can understand without relying on private inbox history. This makes the Address History record more useful during absence, escalation, service review or a later audit.

03 · Exceptions

Design for the case that does not fit

Property work includes incomplete forms, late evidence, changed instructions, unavailable suppliers and circumstances requiring discretion. The system should expose those exceptions, preserve notes and direct them to an authorised person instead of silently forcing a misleading “complete” status.

04 · Implementation

Configure from representative work

Implementation should begin with real examples from the organisation: a recent case that went well, one that stalled and one that exposed missing information. Those examples reveal the fields, permissions, notifications and escalation points the configured workflow actually needs. Document what remains outside the system as well, so teams understand the boundary between Proplix, connected services and professional responsibility.

05 · Review

Measure whether the work is improving

A sensible review looks at completion time, avoidable follow-up, unresolved exceptions, record quality and the amount of manual reconciliation still required. The aim is dependable work and clearer service, not automation for its own sake. Review findings with the people completing Address History work, because a dashboard may not reveal the manual workaround being used beside it.

06 · Ongoing control

Keep guidance, permissions and records current

Ownership, legislation, services and internal policies change. Schedule periodic checks of access, templates, notifications, integrations and retained information. Record material changes and brief affected users so the configured workflow continues to reflect the organisation’s approved way of working.

Proplix supports structured workflow and evidence handling; it does not provide legal advice or remove the need for competent human review. Discuss your organisation, migration or integration requirements through the central secure enquiry route.

Discuss Address History requirements →

Plan your next step

Bring a typical case, the systems you use and the main problem you want to solve. Together we can map the records, responsibilities and checks needed for a useful first release.

Explore software integrations, compare enterprise modules or discuss a custom property workflow. The agreed scope will explain what is included, what needs configuration and how your team will be supported.

Plan the right route

See what a more connected property day looks like

Bring one real workflow to a Proplix walkthrough. Explore the records, handovers and decisions that matter to your team, then agree a practical next step.

UK Property software
by Britixo
Proplix · One Britixo account One account for Proplix and Britixo services Use your Britixo account to manage your companies, services, billing and support. Product access depends on your approved services. Try Proplix free for 14 days · No billing details required · No obligation · Secure email and WhatsApp activation.
Secure and controlled Built for property teams Requirements-led setup
WhatsApp